The study, which began before states started legalizing cannabis, published its results on the impact of a legal cannabis environment on cannabis use and alcohol use disorder.
A peer-reviewed, longitudinal study recently published in the journal Psychological Medicine suggested that people who live in states where cannabis was legal experienced lower rates of alcohol use disorder (AUD) compared to those who lived in states where cannabis was illegal (1). The study, funded by grants from the National Institutes of Health, involved 240 pairs of twins (one twin living in a state with legalized cannabis, and the other twin in a state where cannabis was illegal) and sought to quantify the impact of recreational cannabis on substance use, day-to-day functioning, and whether vulnerable people are more susceptible to potential negative effects than others (1).
The “Results” section of the paper stated (2): “In the co-twin control design accounting for earlier cannabis frequency and alcohol use disorder symptoms respectively, the twin living in a recreational state used cannabis on average more often, and had fewer AUD symptoms than their co-twin living in a non-recreational state. Cannabis legalization was associated with no other adverse outcome in the co-twin design, including cannabis use disorder. No risk factor significantly interacted with legalization status to predict any outcome.”
“Recreational legalization was associated with increased cannabis use and decreased AUD symptoms, but was not associated with other maladaptations” (2), the authors of the study concluded. “Moreover, vulnerabilities to cannabis use were not exacerbated by the legal cannabis environment.”
The authors did acknowledge that not all outcomes typically associated with cannabis use were evaluated and that a broadly characterized sample population was used (1). In its conclusion, the study suggested that further research could investigate causal links between cannabis consumption and outcomes (2). “Prevention and intervention efforts may be best implemented by continuing to target established risk factors rather than focusing on availability,” they also concluded (1).
References
Ep 27: Tracking Strains in Diverse Landscapes
July 2nd 2025In this latest installment of Noid Knowledge, we are joined by Daniela Vergara, PhD, Hemp Specialist at the Cornell Cooperative Extension, and Anna Schwabe, PhD, Associate Lecture Professor at the University of Colorado, discussing the evolution of cannabis cultivation and the need for regional climate data. Their recent project, funded by the Agricultural Genomics Foundation, studies 10 cannabis varieties grown by farmers in different regions, specifically plant characteristics, soil type, and harvest metrics. They aim to understand how environmental factors affect cannabis yield and quality, providing actionable insights for farmers and breeders.
Ep 26: Innovations in Drying and Curing to Protect Flower Quality
May 27th 2025In this latest installment of Noid Knowledge, we are joined by Dr. Allison Justice, Founder and CEO of the Hemp Mine, and David Sandelman COO, CTO & Co-Founder of Cannatrol. Here, Allison and David discuss innovations in cannabis drying and curing, focusing on the Cannatrol technology which controls vapor pressure, preserving trichome integrity, and flower quality. Additionally, Allison shares how the Cannabis Research Center and Coalition (CRC) is transition to an open-source model to support cultivators, researchers, and home growers.
Best of the Week: June 27 – July 03, 2025
July 4th 2025Here, we bring you our top five recent articles covering cannabis on state-tribal cannabis regulations in Montana, our podcast discussion on cannabis cultivation, our blog on compliance with federal regulations, public commentary on new standards, and hemp packaging enforcement in Florida.