The survey asked about patient cannabis use, openness to discussing cannabis as part of treatment plans, and perspectives on substance use of physicians.
Image | adobe.stock/smolaw11
A recently published survey aimed to collect patient perspectives on cannabis use by physicians, compared with alcohol or nicotine, outside of work (1). The study noted the status of cannabis as a Schedule I substance as a potential factor in patient perceptions. It also noted that lack of evidence for the efficacy of cannabis for upper extremity conditions. The study, “Perceptions of Patient and Surgeon Marijuana Use: A Survey Study of Upper-Extremity Patients,” was published in Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online in December 2024.
In this study, 388 surveys were completed in March and April 2024, with 21 questions on the survey. The surveys were completed by upper-extremity adult patients at a medical institute in Pennsylvania, which currently allows medical cannabis use, but not recreational use. The average age of the participants was 55 years, and 58% of identified as women Survey questions were split into three sections. Section 1 included demographic information (age, gender, race, level of education, reason for visit, marital status, and employment status, cannabis use and method of ingestion). Section 2 was the Brief Marijuana Effect Expectancies Questionnaire (MEEQ-Brief). Section 3 asked questions about willingness to discuss cannabis use as part of a treatment plan, as well as comfort level of physician use of cannabis, alcohol, and nicotine.
The final question presented the statement “I am comfortable with my doctor using the following substances outside of work,” listed four substances (alcohol, nicotine, prescribed marijuana, and recreational marijuana), and participants indicated one of five answer options for each substance, which ranged from “Strongly Agree” to “Strongly Disagree” and included “Prefer Not to Answer.”
Highlighted results from the first section of the survey include:
From the second section, results include:
In the third section, results include:
Limitations to the study included a homogenous population in a single setting and possible influence from the state’s laws on cannabis.
The researchers concluded that in this study group, responses were highly variable, but understanding patient perspectives could help shape future policies for health systems and licensing boards. “More patients were comfortable with their physician using marijuana outside of work than not, and patients were as comfortable with their physicians using medical marijuana as they were with nicotine. Patient demographic factors and history of personal marijuana use were not associated with perceptions of potential physician marijuana use outside of work.”
Reference